Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 14:45

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Blocking Opioid Receptors May Restore Healthy Dopamine Balance - Neuroscience News
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
The New Twist In Regeneron's 23andMe Bankruptcy Buyout - Investor's Business Daily
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What is the story behind bhai dooj?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Mauricio Pochettino on Absent Christian Pulisic: 'Players Cannot Dictate the Plan' - FOX Sports
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Instagram will finally let you rearrange your grid - TechCrunch
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
How does Taylor Swift make sure that she doesn’t show her uterus to her audience and fans?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.